Terrence J. Lewis might not follow the law, but he does follow matters of gastrointestinal etiquette. How else could you explain why the 32-year-old Evansville felon punched a fellow inmate for farting in his presence?
On Friday, Lewis was being held at Vanderburgh County Jail for charges of attempted murder when, on Saturday, he was later accused of punching an elderly inmate—and sending him to the hospital—for passing gas around him. Why exactly? He told jail personnel the inmate was “being disrespectful.”
Lewis might actually have some sort of fanny fascination because when he was getting his routine strip search, police noticed “a foreign object protruding from the anus area.” Before officers could make a move, Lewis pulled a small plastic bag from his rectum and—GAG ALERT!—immediately shoved it in his mouth. In the bag was cigarette tobacco and 1 gram of weed.
Now, in addition to the attempted murder charges, Lewis also faces felony charges of possession of marijuana, trafficking contraband and battery.
Incidents listed are selected by the Officer In Charge of each shift that may have significant public interest.
Incidents listed are not inclusive of all incidents. Requests for information can be directed to the MPD Records Unit: (608) 266-4075.
Incident Report for Case #2014-241659
07/28/2014 – 2:41 PM
West Beltline Highway (at Fish Hatchery Rd.)
Vicente J. Albino Esteban, age 33, Madison
Driver was arrested for Operating While Intoxicated – 4th offense, Operating While Revoked, Open Intoxicants in Motor Vehicle and Inattentive Driving.
Released 07/29/2014 at 10:45 AM by PIO Joel Despain
An intoxicated driver caused a three vehicle crash Monday afternoon while trying to exit the West Beltline Highway onto Fish Hatchery Rd. The suspect plowed the pickup truck he was operating into another truck, causing the second truck to strike a car. The drivers of the impacted vehicles had stopped for a red light. Both saw the suspect get out of the heavily damaged pickup and toss a bag of empty beer cans down a grassy hill. The evidence was later collected by police. The suspect was arrested on several tentative charges, including fourth offense drunken driving.
Released 07/29/2014 at 10:45 AM by PIO Joel Despain
A flat bed semi-trailer rolled over on its side blocking all lanes of the 4500 block of West Marginal Way around 7:18 a.m. this morning. Police say the truck may have rolled over because a loose container of dry cement it was carrying shifted and destabilized the truck. Seattle Fire medics responded and treated the adult male driver for minor injuries. The closure is expected to last around two to three hours. Commercial Vehicle Enforcement is on scene to determine whether the driver committed any violations.
ALBANY, N.Y. (CN) – A New York man whose co-worker’s angry husband threatened to kill him is entitled to workers’ compensation benefits, a New York state appeals court ruled. Arthur Mosley work…
WASHINGTON (CN) – Former Harbinger Capital Partners COO Peter A. Jenson will pay $200,000 to settle charges that he assisted a scheme to let its owner Philip Falcone misappropriate millions of dollars from a hedge fund to pay Falcone’s personal taxe…
DALLAS (CN) – A North Texas man mailed more than 500 white powder hoax letters around the world, claiming to be from al Qaida, causing government agencies to waste an enormous amount of resources, federal prosecutors say.&…
INDIANPOLIS (CN) – Taco Bell fired a general manager who had worked for it for 27 years after a higher-up saw a Latino employee in her restaurant and told her, “Didn’t I tell you not to hire Hispanics?” the former manager claims in court. Juanita O’Connell sued Taco Bell of America in Federal Court. They are the only parties to the lawsuit. O’Connell, 60, a Mexican-American, had worked at Taco bell since Jan. 10, 1987, and was the general manager of an outlet when she was fired, she says in the lawsuit. The complaint states: “During the course of plaintiff’s employment, defendant’s Company Operations Leader, Mark Lewis, told plaintiff not to hire Hispanics. “Plaintiff complained to defendant’s management that such conduct on the part of Lewis was discriminatory. “Subsequently, Lewis came to plaintiff’s store location and saw a Hispanic employee by the name of Feliciano Romero. Lewis remarked to plaintiff, ‘Didn’t I tell you not to hire Hispanics?’ or words to that effect. Approximately two (2) weeks later, plaintiff’s area coach, Bryan Smith, issued plaintiff a disciplinary warning after asking plaintiff misleading questions about her operation. “Only three (3) hours later, Smith terminated plaintiff’s employment, alleging that she violated the Manager Code and had an ‘I-9′ violation.” An I-9 is an immigrant work authorization form. O’Connell says she was replaced by a 25-year-old black man. O’Connell seeks lost wages, costs, and damages for civil rights violations (42 U.S.C. §1981), and nationality and gender discrimination. She is represented by Joel Paul, with Ramey & Haley. Taco Bell, based in Irvine, Calif., has more than 6,500 outlets, most of them in the United States. It has more than 175,000 employees and about $2 billion a year in revenue. It is a subsidiary of Yum! Brands, which also owns KFC and Pizza Hut. Yum! has more outlets than any other fast-food chain in the world – more than 40,000 of them. It reports annual revenue of about $13 billion.
WASHINGTON (CN) – General Motors, Ford and others owe the Alliance of Artists and Recording Companies a lot of money for importing “in-vehicle CD-copying devices” that violate copyright law, the Alliance claims in a federal class action. Lead plaintiff AARC sued General Motors, Ford Motor Co., Denso International America, and Clarion Corp. of America, on July 25 in Federal Court. The AARC is based in Alexandria, Va. It seeks actual damages, statutory damages of $2,500 for each illegal device manufactured, imported or distributed for the previous three years, plus another 50 percent of actual damages, to be paid to the Register of Copyrights. The AARC sued under the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992, 17 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq., a section of U.S. copyright law. The AARC was established after the Act was passed, to defend the rights of artists, as home copying of music became possible and popular. “Congress enacted the AHRA to ensure both that consumers would have access to digital audio copying technology and that artists and other copyright owners would be fairly compensated for the copying of their works,” AARC says in the lawsuit. It continues: “Defendants are multibillion-dollar companies that manufacture, import, and/or distribute hundreds of thousands of products in the United States every year. Defendants are also beneficiaries of the AHRA, which shields them from liability for copyright infringement for manufacturing, importing, and/or distributing certain recording devices as long as they (a) incorporate certain copying control technology and (b) pay a modest royalty per device that is then distributed to musical artists and music copyright owners. Nonetheless, defendants have refused to comply with the AHRA and refused to pay the royalties that Congress has determined they owe for the recording devices they manufacture, import, and/or distribute – notwithstanding intensive efforts by the AARC going back at least two years to persuade defendants to live up to their statutory obligations. Defendants’ intransigence has left the AARC with no choice but to file this lawsuit.” The AARC claims the defendants violate copyright law by manufacturing or importing and distributing digital audio recording devices without complying with the AHRA. “Defendants distribute these devices either pre-installed in vehicles or intended for use in vehicles. Defendants designed these devices for the express purpose of copying music CDs and other digital musical recordings to a hard drive on the devices, and they market these devices emphasizing that copying function. By doing so, defendants violate the AHRA because defendants (a) have not registered these devices with the U.S. Copyright Office; (b) have not paid royalties for these devices; and (c) have not incorporated the Serial Copy Management System or its functional equivalent in these devices, all of which are required by the AHRA.” The AARC claims that other manufacturers of in-vehicle CD-copying devices comply with the law, and pay the required royalties through the Copyright Office. Denso is a Delaware corporation based in Southfield, Mich. Clarion Corp. in a California corporation based in Cypress, Calif. Under the Audio Home Recording Act, digital audio recording devices (DARD) are not supposed to be able to copy a copy of a CD. The DARD therefore must be able to distinguish an original from a copy, and “must never allow a user to copy a ‘copy,’” according to the complaint. The device that performs these functions is the Serial Copy Management System. The AARC claims that General Motors offers what it calls a “Hard Drive Device” in a slew of models, including Cadillacs, which allow illegal copying. Denso supplies it with the devices, according to the complaint. Ford does the same thing, in its Ford and Lincoln brands, and gets the devices from Clarion, the AARC says. Ford calls it a “Jukebox.” The AARC seeks declaratory judgment, an injunction, damages and costs. It is represented by Dustin Cho, with Covington & Burling.
NEW ORLEANS (CN) – Texas’ ban on charities spending bingo money on political advocacy is an unconstitutional violation of free speech, the 5th Circuit ruled Monday. Several charities – includin…